Fran O’Sullivan’s piece in this morning’s Herald begins:
What’s the difference between Sarah Palin and Barack Obama?
One is a well-turned-out babe, a spunk and, let’s be frank, a pretty sexy piece of eye candy.
The other kills her own food.
(Note that this is not an original joke, but is a favourite on the neocon blogs that Fran loves so much.)
We could have a lot of fun doing this ourselves…
One of them will talk to the press, the other won’t.
And so on.
Anyway, Fran’s neocon frothing — I guess dubya would call her the “angry right” — continues:
“After all the sanctimonious, highly chauvinistic and patronising columns slating the qualifications of the Alaskan Governor to be the Republican’s vice-presidential nominee candidate…”
Yeah sure Fran, a few years running a three stop-light town and two years running a state with half the population of Auckland. Oh, and the PTA, mustn’t forget that. Gee, it’s hard not to be patronising.
Speaking of Palin’s “qualifications” to be commander-in-chief of the world’s most powerful country, and to stare down Vladimir Putin — which is what we’re actually talking about Fran, nota bene — there is now a transcript available of Palin’s vetting by McCain.
Also, for a more balanced right-wing perspective in today’s Herald, try John Roughan.
Update: Russell Brown dissects Fran’s column in more depth. Quit while you’re ahead, Fran.
